![]() ![]() One of the biggest complaints about Picatinny rail systems is that they’re too heavy. Plus, you can swap and reposition attachments quickly. When talking about handling, M-Lok systems are generally easier to master because they make accessory mounting so efficient. That rail has a slightly uncomfortable “cheese grater” feel that may require rail covers. So, you can incorporate more attachments without needing multiple pieces.Ĭonversely, a straight-rail Picatinny doesn’t have that all-around access, but the bulkier quad-rail does. Regarding ergonomics, an M-Lok system handles better because it wraps around the entire barrel. ![]() Sometimes, shooters can cut themselves if they’re not careful when grabbing an accessory like a front handle. The design of a Picatinny system is actually pretty sharp when it’s brand-new. However, the Picatinny does have a rigid, “cheese grater” appearance that is less ergonomic than the M-Lok. Since you have to attach Pic rails individually, they don’t affect the silhouette of a rifle too much unless you’re adding multiple pieces at once. However, it also provides an immediate military or tactical appearance, which can be visually appealing for most shooters. Handguard Profiles: Picatinny vs M-LokĪs a free-float design, M-Lok rail systems make the barrel of your rifle seem thicker and bulkier, particularly once you mount attachments. The vibrations and heat will loosen the screws, so they’ll eventually pop out. However, one significant issue you can experience with Picatinny is that they will come loose the more you fire your gun. Not only is it much easier to install an M-Lok rail to a rifle, but you can mount accessories on all sides immediately without needing multiple pieces.Īnother advantage of the M-Lok system is that you can attach Picatinny rails to the negative spaces and combine both systems to get the best of each. So, if you want to mount an optical sight and a front handle, you need two individual pieces.īy comparison, M-Lok systems use a free-float design that attaches to the barrel and itself. If you’re going to attach a Picatinny Rail to your rifle, you need to screw the piece into your firearm so that it’ll hold steady, even after repeated outings. ![]() Here’s a comprehensive breakdown of factors to consider when comparing the M-Lok system to a Pic Rail. However, many shooters prefer the M-Lok because it’s easier to use, but it’s not quite as durable as Picatinny. It’s hard to say definitively whether one rail system is “better” than another. While a Picatinny Rail system uses grooves, an M-Lok system uses holes and T-shaped screws for faster and easier mounting. This meant you could put the handguard over the rifle barrel and start attaching accessories immediately. Unlike Picatinny rails that attached to specific parts of the gun, Magpul developed a revolutionary “free-float” design. While the Picatinny Rail System was the gold standard for over a decade, Magpul decided to create the M-Lok system in 2007, although the version we know today didn’t exist until 2014. This change made it easier to zero out any scopes attached to the rail and allowed for stronger grips between the gun and the attachment so they don’t fall off.Ī Pic Rail is mainly used to attach optics, but you can attach accessories to other parts of the rifle like flashlights, front handles, bipods, and more. The most notable revision was in 2009 when NATO recommended the manufacturer switch to a metric system and update the clamping method. The name Picatinny stems from the location where it was developed – the Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey.Īlthough the original rail system was created in 1995, it’s undergone a few upgrades over the years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |